Composite alternatives in group decision support
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Composite alternatives in group decision support
Decision theoretic models of group decision processes usually assume a given set of alternatives, about which the decision has to take place. In realistic group decision situations, however, alternatives are often not specified a priori, but are created during the group process from different components introduced by the group members. This paper develops methods for systematically creating suc...
متن کاملOn Ranking of Alternatives in Uncertain Group Decision Making Model
The weighted geometric mean ordering vector and logarithmic least squares are proposed to aggregate information of decision makers to generate weight vector from uncertainty comparison matrices in uncertain group AHP model. Especially, when the judgment matrices are incomplete, the latter can be developed to derive priorities under the condition of minimal deviation. Some concepts in uncertaint...
متن کاملA decision support system for regional hazardous waste management alternatives
With the passage of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRA and the subsequent amendments to RCRA e orts to provide tighter controls on the transportation and disposal of hazardous waste have been steadily gaining ground This paper intended as a decision support tool for regional planning incorporates information on the hazardous waste generation treatment capacity and the costs of wast...
متن کاملLeadership and group search in group decision support systems
Ž . Groups using group decision support systems GDSS for addressing organizational problems is an evolutionary process. An analytical model incorporating evolutionary processes exists, capturing this adaptation in the group decision-making Ž . process. This model is based on the genetic algorithm GA and can be used to estimate GA parameter values from experimental data. This research effort exa...
متن کاملThe negotiable alternatives identifier for group negotiation support
It has been observed that in single voting unanimity can rarely be reached. In many situations, however, members may not be aware that their preferences as expressed by their votes may contain room for compromise. This paper proposes a consensus-seeking methodology ± the Negotiable Alternatives Identi®er (NAI) ± that searches for such a compromise. Starting with individual cardinal preferences ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annals of Operations Research
سال: 1994
ISSN: 0254-5330,1572-9338
DOI: 10.1007/bf02078896